The Chicago Exchanges vs Eurex US
Code : ITF0010
|
Region : :USA |
||||
OR |
|||||
Introduction:
OnOctober 16th 2003, Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT) in its ‘Final Comment letter’ to Commodities Futures Trading
Commission (CFTC) wrote that the commission should not approve Eurex US’ application for contractmarket designation,
as the applicationwasmaterially incomplete4 . On November 6th 2003,ChicagoMercantile Exchange Inc. (CME) Chairman
Terry Duffy said, “CMEwelcomes competitors who share our commitment to amarket structure that puts the interest of the
investing public first. There are two important tests that every exchangemustmeet before it can claimto be operating in public
interest. Itsmarket structure and trading rulesmust be open and transparent, and theremust be equitable treatment of all
transactions.”Duffy noted, “CME is concerned about the EurexU.S. application, which omits any information regarding the
exchange’s plannedmeans andmethods of operations. It is so devoid of real information that it fails to specify the contracts
that will be traded. Now that the time pressures of the fast track approval process have been removed, we believe that a
critical examination of . . . aspects of Eurex’s proposed plan is in order.” |
|
For Case Books
Click Here >> For Case eBooks Click Here >> |